 N/A 1st/2nd Gen Numbers |
 May 23 2006, 10:04 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Post Master  Group: Members Posts: 986 Joined: 7-July 04 From: Central Illinois Member No.: 318  |
BHP or WHP, curb weight, 0-60, quarter, etc. of 1st and 2nd gen N/A 4 cylinders is what I'm lookin' for. Stock or modded w/mod list.
I know it's all about FI, but I have this little (non-DSM) 4 cylinder I have to live with and am wondering about comparisons. She's 180bhp @ 2600 lbs with power delivery at high revs (fuel cut = 8300). I don't see much beef on here about N/A performance. What could those 1st 2 gen's do? Thanks. -------------------- ... she likes bein' forced ...
|
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 6)
|
May 23 2006, 10:07 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
DSM Tech Wizard Group: Members Posts: 2,256 Joined: 10-January 01 From: central IL Member No.: 10 |
I think the 1st gen 2.0 NA's are around 130hp at the flywheel, and probably weigh around 3000#. A few guys have stuck turbo's on the na's, but other than that I think people have figured out that the turbo's are a lot smarter to start with in the first place.
-------------------- The fastest car I own is a minivan....
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 08:46 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 986 Joined: 7-July 04 From: Central Illinois Member No.: 318 |
Well, in all honesty, it was about knowing whether I could roast the N/A 4 cylinders or not with this thing.
-------------------- ... she likes bein' forced ...
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 10:35 AM
Post
#4
|
|
 Post Master Group: Members Posts: 908 Joined: 7-October 03 From: Chillicothe, IL Member No.: 182 |
My old 2.4L galant ran 16.3@82 in a quarter. That's 160-170crank horses and around 3200pounds.
-------------------- GVR4 866/1000 = the perpetually broken car
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 11:58 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 986 Joined: 7-July 04 From: Central Illinois Member No.: 318 |
I think this thing runs 14s - but it's all speculation for now.
My son asked after I got it whether he was going to have to drive it up to Cordova with me next time so I could run both. *Laughs* I told him no ... but ... *shrugs* -------------------- ... she likes bein' forced ...
|
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 12:06 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Person of Wisdom Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 3-March 03 From: Bloomington Member No.: 97 |
QUOTE (Kazz5 @ May 24 2006, 12:58 PM) I think this thing runs 14s - but it's all speculation for now. My son asked after I got it whether he was going to have to drive it up to Cordova with me next time so I could run both. *Laughs* I told him no ... but ... *shrugs* i would tack on an extra second or two, to the 14 second guesstimate......... -------------------- 1990 Nissan 300ZX T
1992 Accord EX |
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 01:52 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 986 Joined: 7-July 04 From: Central Illinois Member No.: 318 |
Sorry, you're right. 15's now, 14's after it's tuned in a few short weeks. But it's all just a guess.
-------------------- ... she likes bein' forced ...
|
|
|
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st July 2026 - 04:38 AM |
Powered By IP.Board
© 2026 IPS, Inc.