Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Newer car purchase
need help picking a new car!
need help picking a new car!
2006 Nissan Sentra 1.8S new [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer ES 30K [ 6 ] ** [85.71%]
03-06 Grand Am [ 1 ] ** [14.29%]
Total Votes: 7
Guests cannot vote 
Taxiwardance
post Jun 18 2006, 02:08 PM
Post #1


DSMCentral Freak
****

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Peoria Heights
Member No.: 59



Anybody have any experience with either the Mitsubishi Lancer ES (2004-2006) or the Nissan Sentra 1.8 S (2003-2006) I am looking to buy a car on Monday and have narrowed it down to the two. I can get the Sentra for 13,990 brand new off the lot or the Lancer 2004 for 10K with 30K miles. Both are autos. I drove the Sentra and it seemed OK but the ride wasn’t that great. Haven’t drove the Lancer in about a year but I drove stick when I took it for a test drive before. I have the wife and 2 kids and just looking for a cheap get around car with 4 doors and great gas mileage. Any opinions, will be buying first thing Monday so I can make a cross country trip and I can’t make up my mind. Any other cars I should be considering, under 13K if possible. Insurance is cheaper on American cars but I can’t find anything that gets good MPG and doesn’t look like a piece of ass (Aveo)!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 11)
Taxiwardance
post Jun 18 2006, 02:08 PM
Post #2


DSMCentral Freak
****

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Peoria Heights
Member No.: 59



I’ve looked around at a lot of Civics and will be checking out one Monday morning but I have one of those “Capitol One Blank Checks” maximum value is 14.5K and the car must be at or under 30K miles and 2000 or newer from a franchised dealership. So trying to find a civic that meets that criteria has proven to be a real PITA! If they would let me do a private party purchase then that would be my first choice. Only thing holding me back on the Sentra is the depreciation of a new car. Especially a Nissan Sentra! The lancer has a bit of that removed but I’ve never really cared for either much.


*EDIT * I know there is no 06 Grand Am i let that slip by me
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kazz5
post Jun 18 2006, 04:03 PM
Post #3


Post Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 986
Joined: 7-July 04
From: Central Illinois
Member No.: 318



I'd check into Mazda Protege models and Toyota Corollas also, although I don't know if they'd end up in your price/mileage/age range. I'd have a personal preference to go there over either of those you mentioned - but that's a personal preference.

I heard something about engine fires with 4 cylinder ... Sentras? Or was it the Altimas... I think it was the Altimas but a quick search will tell you.

I'd hedge towards the Nissan, actually because they have more reliability record than a Mitsu (gonna get flamed now, aren't I). Otherwise this is a personal/family decision as to what works best.

I showed my wife the STi, the Evo, and then SRT4. She said the Neon was too small and a Neon and the STi was too ugly... so, ta-DAH! *Laughs* Of course, it's what I had planned, but, the point is, if you have to please everybody make sure your choice pleases everybody...

Good luck and do a VIN search...


--------------------
... she likes bein' forced ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
turbohcar
post Jun 18 2006, 04:37 PM
Post #4


DSM Tech Wizard
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,404
Joined: 16-December 03
From: Fletcher/Bloomington
Member No.: 214



MidwestDSM and I worked in a local Nissan dealership together recently and between the two of us, we could pretty much answer any questions you might have. Personally, I like the Lancer idea, but I'm just basing it off of the 2.4L powerplant and the exterior looks of the car. Problem with the Sentra is it's the only Nissan made in Mexico and it shows. Everything about the car is cheap cheap cheap. Granted it's only 13k but in my opinion, it's only about 8k worth of material. The 1.8L is a great/reliable motor but it's severely lacking in the power dept. 126hp is all the 1.8 is rated at and it's amazing it makes that much. The front end pushes and gives the steering input of a tugboat making a 90* turn.

The girlfriend bought an 04 Grand Am last year and so far, I'm quite happy with it. She's never calculated mileage but I estimate somewhere in the high twenties to low thirtys on the highway between Champaign and LeRoy. She got an SE with the 3.4L and it will get up and go when pushed to do so. The stock tires on the car were absolute crap from the beginning though. We recently put Kumho Solus KH15 tires on it to replace the stockers (a Grand Touring All Season) and they really woke it up. It handles almost as well as the Talon did and only seems to push when it's at the limit. There are two main concerns about the Grand Am though. The 3.4L likes to spit intake gaskets at the higher mileages and you have to stay on top of the transmission services. The transmissions are pretty sensitive and if not taken care of properly, will fail at an early age. Change fluid and filter every 30K and you'll be fine.

I've got absolutely no first hand experience with the Lancer but from verbal reviews and magazine articles, they seem to be a pretty stout package for the little cars they are. Zippy, and fun handling are two phrases that seem to keep reappearing. Good luck in your search!


--------------------
"I hear he tunes the space shuttle also...and that thing is fast"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
haunter
post Jun 18 2006, 07:13 PM
Post #5


DSMCentral Freak
****

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 6-November 04
From: Urbana
Member No.: 382



we were very happy with our 02 GA GT

it wasnt the very best on gas, but its a larger car with a torque-y V6

all of them should do the trick, but I hated my friends 00 sentra 2.0 as it felt very disconnected from everything


--------------------
QUOTE (scrapin_frame)
christian, i may be interested in your bottom end!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ralliartist
post Jun 19 2006, 09:56 AM
Post #6


Beginner
*

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 31-May 06
From: Plattsmouth, NE
Member No.: 900



the lancer he is looking at has a 2.0 not a 2.4! it's great on gas milage and still is kind of peppy to not have that much horsepower. it handles decent too. it will last you a long enough time. no real concerns about the car have ever really been noted. I say get the lancer! take it from a lancer owner!


--------------------
'92 talon tsi awd
fp2544 powered (44lbs/min, dual bb)
2005 Lancer Ralliart (stock) 15.6@87mph (2.39 60ft.)
user posted image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AWD DSM 1
post Jun 19 2006, 10:06 AM
Post #7


DSM Tech Wizard
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,256
Joined: 10-January 01
From: central IL
Member No.: 10



We used to own a 99 grand am v-6. Best car we ever had. 3.4 is very peppy. We got 34mpg out on the highway and 28 around town. My sister actually owns an alero (same car under the olds name) and has 50k on it, only repairs have been brakes. Very solid, handles nice.... plus they can be found pretty cheap with a feew miles on them. biggthumpup.gif


--------------------
The fastest car I own is a minivan....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
black92_tsi_awd
post Jun 19 2006, 10:36 AM
Post #8


Eats and sleeps DSM jargin.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,995
Joined: 27-November 04
From: Yates City IL
Member No.: 389



I know it wasn't one of your choices...but consider looking at Impalas. The 3400 series motor should be the same as the Grand Am. Gets decent gas milage (25-30) and has a huge trunk. Hauls the family (2 kids) on trips nicely with all the associated crap.


--------------------
92 Eagle Talon TSI AWD "The Black Golfball" How fast can a 14B go???
91 Chevy C1500 "Problem Child" **SOLD**
01 Impala DD
07 Trailblazer Wife's new DD

Cars run on blood, sweat, and horsepower...
Without the first two, you can't get the last"

SOB Racing "Sitting On Blocks"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Taxiwardance
post Jun 19 2006, 12:45 PM
Post #9


DSMCentral Freak
****

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Peoria Heights
Member No.: 59



Thanks for all the help! I ended up going with D - New 2006 Lancer ES . Took it and the sentra for a ride and the sentra (even though the color, and darker interior I wanted) just didn’t seem as good of a car. So I guess long term the lancer was what I was looking for. I had heard a few negative things on the sentra as well. So New Lancer it is. Sticker was 17,6XX got it for 13,5XX plus tax, etc etc. Nice DD. I'm Headed down to Wichita in a few hours for the week so thanks again for the input, and swaying me away from the Sentra!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
turbohcar
post Jun 19 2006, 01:43 PM
Post #10


DSM Tech Wizard
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,404
Joined: 16-December 03
From: Fletcher/Bloomington
Member No.: 214



QUOTE (Ralliartist @ Jun 19 2006, 09:56 AM)
the lancer he is looking at has a 2.0 not a 2.4! it's great on gas milage and still is kind of peppy to not have that much horsepower. it handles decent too. it will last you a long enough time. no real concerns about the car have ever really been noted. I say get the lancer! take it from a lancer owner!

Sorry for the misinformation, I thought they had put the 4G64 in those cars.


--------------------
"I hear he tunes the space shuttle also...and that thing is fast"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ralliartist
post Jun 20 2006, 06:57 AM
Post #11


Beginner
*

Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 31-May 06
From: Plattsmouth, NE
Member No.: 900



yea, the base lancers have the 4g94 and the ralliart (the one I drive) has the 4g64. no biggie tho!


--------------------
'92 talon tsi awd
fp2544 powered (44lbs/min, dual bb)
2005 Lancer Ralliart (stock) 15.6@87mph (2.39 60ft.)
user posted image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Taxiwardance
post Jun 24 2006, 06:13 PM
Post #12


DSMCentral Freak
****

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Peoria Heights
Member No.: 59



Well just got back this afternoon. Car runs great although it lacks the power I would have liked. But that was expected when the car was bought. 3k miles in 6 days and a “moderately” roomy interior, back seat is a lot bigger than the Sentra. Saw around 26 mpg hwy while driving about 90 to 100 mph from Peoria to Austin TX with the air on the whole way. And around 33-35 mpg the way back with the air off and around 80 to 90 mph ( Car is Auto) . From Dallas to Wisconsin Dells in just under 13 hours biggthumpup.gif . Was a lot of fun though, although I believe I blew more money in the Dells than I did the entire trip combined ph34r.gif .

This post has been edited by Taxiwardance: Jun 24 2006, 06:15 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2026 - 12:58 AM
Design by: IPB Download & eBusiness Discussions