![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Post Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 972 Joined: 30-October 02 Member No.: 34 ![]() |
I'm looking to start offering quality stainless tubular O2 housings in the near future.
Although my personal preference is for an atmospheric dump I understand that might not be the most popular choice. Which brings me to my question. What's your preference, rerouted tubular O2 or dumped O2? thanks! -------------------- |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Zen Master DSM ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 3,008 Joined: 10-January 01 From: in front of you Member No.: 5 ![]() |
Both have their merits. Atmospheric dump for performance reasons, and internally dumped for sound control reasons. I like my atmospheric dump because I've never had any boost creep problems with it and its an extra inch of exhaust flow that not going to experience much if any back pressure when the WG opens. But on the other hand, at WOT it is damn LOUD. Why don't you offer both?
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th October 2025 - 08:34 AM |