Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Rear active toe elimination
wortdog
post Aug 1 2004, 11:57 AM
Post #1


Post Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 626
Joined: 25-September 02
From: Urbana, IL
Member No.: 19



Some of you were interested in the rear active toe thing I mentioned last night, so here's a link with some information on it:

http://www.taboospeedshop.com/atil.htm


--------------------
Eric Wort
87 White Buick Turbo 'T' (11.71 @ 116.5, 1.61 60ft, slipping trans)
92 Teal Eagle Talon TSi AWD (burn victim)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Forcus
post Aug 2 2004, 10:50 AM
Post #2


Beginner
*

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 10-December 02
Member No.: 53



QUOTE (turbohcar @ Aug 2 2004, 09:48 AM)
So, in essence Forcus, you are suggesting that you weld a piece of square cast iron and weld it to the cast iron control arms to keep them from moving backward or forward because the arms are moving at a diagonal direction. Now, if you were to weld in a horizontal piece of square cast iron, the arms wouldn't be allowed to move at the point of weld any more or less than the length of that bar? Seems logical to me but, I would probably still want to weld the arms to the linkage too for extra measure.

No, no welding.

I figured that the way the rear steer was actuated or contained on the GVR4 was on that one mounting point on the arm. So to "lock out" the steering we should be able to use that one point.

Unfortunately, simply extending a short arm with rod ends to the subframe and creating a new mount would probably cause quite a bit of bind. In any case instead of extending it out, extend it forward to the current mount. Basically you are just inhibiting the arm from pivoting by tying in the rear part of the arm to the front and simply utlizing the mount already built in for your tie-in point.

Hell. If I have some time later I'll draw something and scan it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- wortdog   Rear active toe elimination   Aug 1 2004, 11:57 AM
- - turbohcar   So... what it's saying is the active toe link ...   Aug 1 2004, 12:20 PM
- - wortdog   The GVR4 control arms are identical to DSM ones, w...   Aug 1 2004, 12:49 PM
- - RacerX11   We did that fix on Eric Stemler's old Talon (I...   Aug 1 2004, 02:01 PM
- - turbohcar   Very interesting stuff. I never knew these cars h...   Aug 1 2004, 04:20 PM
- - wortdog   QUOTE (turbohcar @ Aug 1 2004, 10:20 PM)On a ...   Aug 1 2004, 05:01 PM
- - turbohcar   I see....all very interesting. Thanks   Aug 1 2004, 05:26 PM
- - RacerX11   If you are going to do this on a street-driven car...   Aug 1 2004, 08:55 PM
- - wortdog   Yes, that is an issue. If you elect to leave the ...   Aug 1 2004, 11:00 PM
- - SCCA Stang   does all this mean that the rear suspension is str...   Aug 2 2004, 01:04 AM
- - Forcus   I was with it until the welding cast iron part. M...   Aug 2 2004, 06:58 AM
- - turbohcar   So, in essence Forcus, you are suggesting that you...   Aug 2 2004, 08:48 AM
- - Forcus   QUOTE (turbohcar @ Aug 2 2004, 09:48 AM)So, i...   Aug 2 2004, 10:50 AM
- - wortdog   I'd probably just drill a hole right next to t...   Aug 2 2004, 12:48 PM
- - SCCA Stang   QUOTE I'd probably just drill a hole right nex...   Aug 2 2004, 03:57 PM
- - Forcus   I like that idea too. Much simpler than what I was...   Aug 3 2004, 08:52 AM
- - natedogg   This makes me curious as to what they did for the ...   Aug 3 2004, 09:31 AM
- - turbohcar   I was just thinking that Nate.   Aug 4 2004, 09:51 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:53 PM
Design by: IPB Download & eBusiness Discussions