MAF Translator version 2.01 discussion, What are your thoughts and findings Options

[awd4kicks]

I've had a few discussions now about the MAFT 2.01 tuning methods. Tuning with Version 2.01 is obviously different than previous versions.

I'm interested in opinions from those that have experience with the 2.01 MAFT or from those that have researched it anyway. I'd like to hear your experiences with the newer version and if you have found things that work or do not work for your purposes.

[natedogg]

Obviously, the biggest difference is the RPM dependent tuning. I have fooled around with this a little bit and saw very little difference if any in the performance of my car. The basic base, idle, mid, and WOT dial settings do a very good job of metering, modulating, and translating.

When I installed my 2.01 chip it was pretty much plug her in set the dip switches, set the base dial for injector size, and go. Now, of course I have to play with things anyway for fun and for getting the best tune for whatever octane I'm running at the time.

It was a little different tuning with it on Spy's old car though. But there may have been some other factors there as well. We had to do a lot of richening up to finally get the car to run right. So much that we had to tell the MAFT that the car was actually running 100cc less injectors than it was if I remember correctly. It may be even more of a challenge with your 2.4 and WI. I'm always up for a challenge if you'd like a hand.