![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 ![]() |
I've had a few discussions now about the MAFT 2.01 tuning methods. Tuning with Version 2.01 is obviously different than previous versions.
I'm interested in opinions from those that have experience with the 2.01 MAFT or from those that have researched it anyway. I'd like to hear your experiences with the newer version and if you have found things that work or do not work for your purposes. -------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places! ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 ![]() |
Thanks Natedogg
I did run the 2.01 version for the very short time that my 2.0/BR500 and 14b ran last year. The base setting for my 780 injectors ran great for both turbos while the engine lasted. This year and as always I want to make sure I'm tuned for the most possible performance. The RPM tuning seems to be a logical step in this direction. The instructuions for said tuning were less than obvious to figure out for me though. This is why I was hoping to get a feel from others that have used this newer version. -------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places! ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th October 2025 - 12:42 PM |