![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 ![]() |
I've had a few discussions now about the MAFT 2.01 tuning methods. Tuning with Version 2.01 is obviously different than previous versions.
I'm interested in opinions from those that have experience with the 2.01 MAFT or from those that have researched it anyway. I'd like to hear your experiences with the newer version and if you have found things that work or do not work for your purposes. -------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places! ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 ![]() |
In talking to some, they would get fuel trim reading in the 130% range after setting the base for the correct injectors and seeing good O2 nreadings!?! I'm still stuck in the old method of tuning by knock so I need to get a refresher on the whole fuel trim tuning thing again.
Has the MAFT users group proven to be any more useful than it used to be Natedogg? -------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places! ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th October 2025 - 12:42 PM |