 Another GM MAFT thread |
 Apr 23 2003, 02:07 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Post Master  Group: Members Posts: 972 Joined: 30-October 02 Member No.: 34  |
Ok, I'll be upfront that I'm just being a bit of a Devil's Advocate here. I like the MAFT and from what I hear, I'll probably end up owning one. I've plowed through most of the DSMtalk threads on it too. But, just to cause trouble I'll ask the following from those of you that have it.
Anyone have any concrete dyno numbers or even track numbers and actual gains from this mod? Before and after improvements? I know the 3.5 in flows like the Mississipi in and of itself but when you neck down to the throttle body is all that flow lost and even disturbed by all the steps to get it to mate up? The 2G MAS looks to be pretty close to a 3" MAS flowing more or less straight through. Although tuneable, can it match the increments of the SAFC in terms of fine tuning? Granted, everyone who's bought one seems to love it. I'm just wondering if anyone's truly dialed it in on the Dyno and done a side by side with the 'old' SAFC 2G mas combo. OK, flame suit is on. Time to endure the punishment of the translators. 
-------------------- |
 |
 
|
 |
Replies
|
Apr 25 2003, 09:54 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Zen Master DSM Group: Moderators Posts: 3,008 Joined: 10-January 01 From: in front of you Member No.: 5 |
QUOTE (POS AWD @ Apr 25 2003, 09:49 AM) Makes sense. Basically, since it's being pressurized, you can multiply the actual amount of air being moved through the piping. The bigger piping would just make it move easier and reduce the "backpressure' on the compressor of the turbo, right? Big pipe doesn't necessarily = more flow in a pressurized system?  (you'll have to excuse me, it's been 6yrs since I had a physics class) No problem man. I had to stop and think about it too. Anymore brainbusters, Travis? j/k
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
KOU In3 Another GM MAFT thread Apr 23 2003, 02:07 PM
natedogg The MAFT definitely can't match the fine tunin... Apr 23 2003, 02:35 PM KOU In3 Granted the flow numbers are much higher for the M... Apr 24 2003, 01:22 AM natedogg Well, all I can tell you is my butt tells me it ma... Apr 25 2003, 08:17 AM AWD DSM 1 Travis has a good question, why put a huge MAS on ... Apr 25 2003, 08:36 AM natedogg I think flow before the turbo and after the turbo ... Apr 25 2003, 08:51 AM AWD DSM 1 Makes sense. Basically, since it's being pres... Apr 25 2003, 09:49 AM KOU In3 QUOTE (natedogg @ Apr 25 2003, 03:54 PM)[QUOT... Apr 30 2003, 12:11 AM akamiami I've actually had the chance to run both types... Apr 30 2003, 12:43 AM awd4kicks Currently I have to disagree, but there is no hard... Apr 30 2003, 08:57 AM
natedogg Travis, if you plan on driving your car on the str... Apr 30 2003, 09:08 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th October 2025 - 07:32 AM |
Powered By IP.Board
© 2025 IPS, Inc.