Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Intercooler piping material
KOU In3
post Oct 31 2003, 02:11 PM
Post #1


Post Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 972
Joined: 30-October 02
Member No.: 34



Lately it seems as if a lot of the major manufacturers are switching to aluminum intercooler piping. They tend to site two reasons.

1: Weight reduction- That one I'll grant but it seems to come with a possible materials strength issue too IMO (more likely to get dings and dents in the piping I'd think)

2: Heat transfer- This is the one I'm not following. The claim is that the aluminum piping transfers heat better than stainless or mild steel. I'd always thought that the cooling took place in the intercooler and that you'd want your IC pipes (upper especially) to be insulated from the heat of the engine bay if anything.

If I was trying to transfer heat out of my piping I wouldn't be short-routing it either. Is there something I'm missing here? Obviously the decision of the manufacturers to switch is being driven by those far more knowledgable than I am on the subject. So someone fill me in.. what am I missing?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
wortdog
post Oct 31 2003, 03:24 PM
Post #2


Post Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 626
Joined: 25-September 02
From: Urbana, IL
Member No.: 19



These are aluminum can pipes here, I would guess they're using something like 0.049 or 0.060 thickness tubing, which is suprisingly hard to dent. If you're worried about dropping tools on these and denting them, its not a problem. That trailer hitch you use as a breaker bar is about the only thing that could dent a pipe tongue.gif We started using AL tubing for our Formula car waterlines last year, and they've survived the rocks and cones that an open wheel race car has to deal with quite well.

You're pretty much right on the upper-intercooler pipe, but its more of a draw than anything else, I'd say the temp of the air coming out of the IC is close to the underhood temp anyway. As far as the bottom pipe goes, the heat transfer from an AL pipe to air isn't all that great either. For the water lines on the Formula car, it was something like 0.5% to 2% of the total cooling drop from hotside to cold side measured with thermocouples. Water to aluminum to air is more effecient that air to aluminum to air, so you can see the effect would be minimal, even though the temperature difference between the underhood air and the compressor outlet air is around 200-300 degrees F, as compared to the temperature difference of coolant and air of about 100 F. If you drive the turbo far outside of the effeciency range, I could see this as being worthwhile from a cooling standpoint, something around 10% of total cooling.

Aluminum is a little easier to bend and put beads on than steel, and prices are pretty similar. Maybe the price of steel went up? All of the above numbers are educated guesses, I didn't plug anything into the equations, so take it with a grain of salt. The only advantage as far as the car is concerned is the weight IMO.


--------------------
Eric Wort
87 White Buick Turbo 'T' (11.71 @ 116.5, 1.61 60ft, slipping trans)
92 Teal Eagle Talon TSi AWD (burn victim)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th June 2026 - 11:21 AM
Design by: IPB Download & eBusiness Discussions