 Good 4G63 2.0 vs 2.3 writeup |
  |
 Dec 5 2007, 11:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Post Master  Group: Members Posts: 626 Joined: 25-September 02 From: Urbana, IL Member No.: 19  |
I found this on Tuners and figured the other tech-heads might find it interesting, as it covers the hard numbers of stock, stroking, and destroking:
http://www.kidzuku.com/StrokeOrNot.pdf -------------------- Eric Wort
87 White Buick Turbo 'T' (11.71 @ 116.5, 1.61 60ft, slipping trans) 92 Teal Eagle Talon TSi AWD (burn victim) |
 |
 
|
|
Dec 6 2007, 02:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 |
Great find Eric. This paper has a lot of the calculations to state and expound on the differences between the 2.0 and it's stroker variants. I was pleased to see some of the facts behind the results I found with my stroker engines versus my 2.0 engines.
It's nice to know that I truly can make the same peak power with my 2.0 race engine as my old stokers. It's also nice to know that all of my theories for building the stroker 3-4 years ago make mathmatical sense. Good low end torque, quicker spool-up which means better (more use-able) street and auto-x power. -------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places!  |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2024 - 05:37 AM |
Powered By IP.Board
© 2024 IPS, Inc.