Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> E85
ncgalant
post Sep 2 2006, 02:43 PM
Post #21


Post Master
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 908
Joined: 7-October 03
From: Chillicothe, IL
Member No.: 182



QUOTE (badbu68 @ Sep 2 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (gsxracer80 @ Sep 2 2006, 01:07 AM)
if we can simply control detonation and preignition while running gasoline we can do more with gasoline than ethanol

Yeah, that's if you're buying $4/gallon 100 racing gas. E85 is cheap octane.

I don't know how many times I have to say it, OCTANE CONTROLS DETONATION.

The higher the octane, the less detonation.

Yes, it burns w/ less BTUs per unit, that is why you fatten up the fuel curve to run closer to 10:1 afr w/ e85.

As a side note to that. The stock 1g maps call for around 9.5:1 at WOT. So on E85 you may want even more.

Also, when I looked a few months ago at the 66 station in bartonville E85 was 1.85/gallon. Even with 30% lower economy that seems pretty good. Espessially if I can tweak the timing and get that down closer to 20%.


--------------------
GVR4 866/1000 = the perpetually broken car
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
badbu68
post Sep 2 2006, 04:26 PM
Post #22


Person of Wisdom
***

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Joined: 14-January 03
From: Bloomington
Member No.: 66



I've heard a lot of people even running 7 gallons 93 w/ 3 gallons of e85 to give close to 97 octane w/ no mods.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SCCA Stang
post Sep 3 2006, 04:20 PM
Post #23


Eats and sleeps DSM jargin.
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,985
Joined: 30-June 03
From: Peoria, IL
Member No.: 150



QUOTE
Also, when I looked a few months ago at the 66 station in bartonville E85 was 1.85/gallon. Even with 30% lower economy that seems pretty good. Espessially if I can tweak the timing and get that down closer to 20%.


don't know about 1.85/gal... here in aurora, E85 is 2.99/gal with regular 87 octane at 3.06.... BP 93 is 3.39/gal


--------------------
You CAN sleep in your car, but your CAN NOT race your house!!!
-------------------------------------------------------

Double Decker spoilers are uber ricerlicious!!!!

user posted image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
badbu68
post Sep 3 2006, 09:44 PM
Post #24


Person of Wisdom
***

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Joined: 14-January 03
From: Bloomington
Member No.: 66



QUOTE (ncgalant @ Sep 2 2006, 03:43 PM)
The stock 1g maps call for around 9.5:1 at WOT. So on E85 you may want even more.

I was going to say, if you were going to run e85, w/ the stock maps, maybe run a 20% larger injector w/ stock maps to fatten up the curve.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
natedogg
post Sep 5 2006, 07:19 AM
Post #25


Zen Master DSM
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,008
Joined: 10-January 01
From: in front of you
Member No.: 5



QUOTE (badbu68 @ Sep 2 2006, 08:19 AM)
QUOTE (gsxracer80 @ Sep 2 2006, 01:07 AM)
if we can simply control detonation and preignition while running gasoline we can do more with gasoline than ethanol

Yeah, that's if you're buying $4/gallon 100 racing gas. E85 is cheap octane.

I don't know how many times I have to say it, OCTANE CONTROLS DETONATION.

The higher the octane, the less detonation.

Yes, it burns w/ less BTUs per unit, that is why you fatten up the fuel curve to run closer to 10:1 afr w/ e85.

Believe it or not, it is possible to make a point without coming off like an asshole. Try it sometime.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
badbu68
post Sep 5 2006, 10:17 AM
Post #26


Person of Wisdom
***

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Joined: 14-January 03
From: Bloomington
Member No.: 66



QUOTE (natedogg @ Sep 5 2006, 08:19 AM)
Believe it or not, it is possible to make a point without coming off like an asshole. Try it sometime.

Sorry, I didn't think I was being disrespectful, wasn't name calling or anything, just reiterating facts. I tried to explain something without having a bunch of misinformation being thrown around.

I didn't have to post it at all, but I thought dsmers would appreciate it since this group is more budget oriented and that fact that turbo cars need to supress detonation.

If that's coming off like an asshole, then I guess I am.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
natedogg
post Sep 5 2006, 11:28 AM
Post #27


Zen Master DSM
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,008
Joined: 10-January 01
From: in front of you
Member No.: 5



QUOTE (badbu68 @ Sep 2 2006, 08:15 AM)
Der, more compression.

I don't know how many times I have to say it, OCTANE CONTROLS DETONATION.

These are the statements I have a problem with. Its pretty easy to take these statements the wrong way. You can correct someone without saying 'Der!' or using caps lock.

Otherwise we appreciate the post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
awd4kicks
post Sep 7 2006, 06:21 AM
Post #28


DSMCentral Godfather
********

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,823
Joined: 10-January 01
From: Washburn
Member No.: 26



biggrin.gif


--------------------
In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places!
user posted image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th October 2025 - 12:35 AM
Design by: IPB Download & eBusiness Discussions