BudmannG
Nov 19 2005, 05:34 AM
akamiami
Nov 19 2005, 06:37 AM
I like the seats, but everything else is yuck.
BudmannG
Nov 19 2005, 06:40 AM
Well I thought it resimbled the Mazda 6 or the Mitsubishi Diamante. That's why I am not to hot for it.
turbohcar
Nov 19 2005, 08:16 AM
As with the previous EVOs, it's going to have to grow on me. I do like the front end though. Kind of looks like it's snarling at you.
Kazz5
Nov 19 2005, 10:51 AM
Headlights, taillights, interior WILL change. I hope they don't really try to come ANY closer to the fugly Audi/VW blacked out center front ... otherwise ...
Daddy like ... and the 8 will be 4 yrs old ... hmmm ...
Mike
Nov 19 2005, 11:26 AM
Mitsu needs to learn when to stop models and make up new ones. Like the 3g eclipse should have been renamed. I think they should have continued perfecting the same bodystyle on the evo and made it even better. Now they are going to have different problems to work out. Dumbasses! They should let me be in charge!
natedogg
Nov 19 2005, 11:57 AM
I'm not too worried yet. Its still concept.
SCCA Stang
Nov 19 2005, 01:14 PM
I really like the car... I understand that the right hand drive showed in the pics won't come to the states.... the only thing I didn't like is the shifter... other than that, Ben Likey!!!! Ben want one!!!
katie
Nov 19 2005, 01:36 PM

like the 8 much better......... let's hope they make some more changes to this concept
mitsu90
Nov 19 2005, 10:14 PM
I think it looks alot better than that pice of sh!t they are calling an eclipse.
99Spyder
Nov 19 2005, 11:08 PM
Why does that front end make me wanna ask, "That gotta Hemi?"
scorp28
Nov 20 2005, 10:02 PM
I think it looks pretty nice but I would rather take half of what it would cost and put into my car.
ncgalant
Nov 21 2005, 10:34 AM
The body looks way to much like the new galants and the tail lights make me want to vomit.
eclipgst
Nov 21 2005, 09:37 PM
I would have to agree with Kris. The only other thing i like besides the seats are the front head lights. But the evo 8 is sooooo much better!!!!! I even like the concept eclipse gsx better than this thing.
DSMNightmare
Nov 22 2005, 01:07 PM
I like it for the most part. I think it will be more refined for production... at least I hope so because your not going to squeeze my 295lb butt into those seats. I imagine they will because I read somewhere that they purposely widened the US spec seats for the US market on the EVO VIII and IX.
Also has anyone heard any more about how mitsu plans to get more linier power from the 2.0 liter?
93Cobra
Nov 22 2005, 04:25 PM
its alright it doesnt jump on me like the previous evo's have I dont like the shifter at all or really the inside other then the seats and the color
Kazz5
Nov 22 2005, 08:48 PM
from the 10/24 Autoweek's excellent article w/pics:
... will be with us in early 2007 as an '07 model ... new four-cylinder turbo ... routed into Mitsubishi's next-generation all-wheel-drive technology ... expect the next-generation MIVEC to feature in the turbocharged alloy 2.0-liter four-cylinder that Mitsubishi says will produce in the region of 300 hp and offer instant response at all engine speeds thanks to a flat torque curve ... powerplant will mate to a clutchless six-speed auto/manual transmission, reportedly able to swap cogs at the blink of an eye, slicker and more efficient than any manual ... steering wheel-mounted paddles ... [S-AWC (Super All Wheel Control)] integrates with the existing 4wd three-differential and Super Active Yaw Control layout found on the Evo IX, adding active brake control, active steering control and roll-control suspension into the equation ... will stick with the Brembo braking system, but expect new multi-piston calpers all around and larger diameter rotors ...
... strategic weight reduction ... lower the center of gravity ... chassis stiffening ... MacPherson struts up front and a multilink arrangement at the rear ... more highway poise ... [interior design/material improvements] ... advanced multimedia system, centered on a dash-mounted pop-out high-resolution LCD screen ... real-time readings from various engine sensors and up-to-date operating status of the S-AWC. Both navigation and DVD audio controls will be accessible through the screen ...
... the body will also serve as the basis for Ralliart's next-generation WRC contender ...
DSMNightmare
Nov 22 2005, 09:36 PM
That's not the article written by Dino Carbonare is it? Right now it's a bunch of hype... I seriously doubt that model will come out in 2007 just because they need to have enough time to milk the EVO IX for all it is. Most manufacturers don't run a generational auto line for only one year unless it's complete junk.
BudmannG
Nov 22 2005, 09:42 PM
QUOTE (DSMNightmare @ Nov 22 2005, 09:36 PM)
Most manufacturers don't run a generational auto line for only one year unless it's complete junk.
^^

^^
DSMNightmare
Nov 22 2005, 09:59 PM
Although if Mitsu does I can't blame them because for the most part the EVO IX is nothing more than a rebadged EVO VIII with a few minor extras. I went to the dealership and looked at one and I'm not impressed in the slightest.
Kazz5
Nov 22 2005, 10:08 PM
QUOTE (DSMNightmare @ Nov 22 2005, 09:36 PM)
That's not the article written by Dino Carbonare is it? Right now it's a bunch of hype... I seriously doubt that model will come out in 2007 just because they need to have enough time to milk the EVO IX for all it is. Most manufacturers don't run a generational auto line for only one year unless it's complete junk.
Dino Dalle Carbonare, yes.
I don't think this is about production model years for commuters. I believe this is about WRC. If that's true then this is easy to believe ... for some, anyway ...
DSMNightmare
Nov 22 2005, 10:28 PM
If you notice Dino has some misinformation in that article.. one of the big things was something about the production years of the EVO VIII and IX. I read the online article a while back and found a few things wrong with the article. I'd have to see the article again to point out what I'm thinking about. Don't get me wrong Dino is an amazing photographer but that article has some flaws.
Kazz5
Nov 22 2005, 10:32 PM
QUOTE (DSMNightmare @ Nov 22 2005, 10:28 PM)
If you notice Dino has some misinformation in that article.. one of the big things was something about the production years of the EVO VIII and IX. I read the online article a while back and found a few things wrong with the article. I'd have to see the article again to point out what I'm thinking about. Don't get me wrong Dino is an amazing photographer but that article has some flaws.
Understood - and anything may or may not make production let alone be on time. Just thought I'd share the scuttle I had ...
natedogg
Nov 23 2005, 08:29 AM
I don't think it has enough cylinders for you, Image.
Zmann42087
Jul 12 2006, 03:29 PM
The article SCC had about the new "concept X" has me a little bit worried. We all know the 4g63 is gone, but its the talk of the electronically controlled active steering differential that scares me.
Kazz5
Jul 12 2006, 08:35 PM
Agreed.
scrapin_frame
Jul 12 2006, 11:29 PM
why cant they just do with the evo what vw did with the bug in mexico.. just keep the same style going for few decades with minor enhancements
and piss on the new engine.. keep the 4g63
JBone
Jul 13 2006, 05:30 AM
QUOTE (Zmann42087 @ Jul 12 2006, 03:29 PM)
We all know the 4g63 is gone, but its the talk of the electronically controlled active steering differential that scares me.
That probably means it's just electronic power steering, same as on: Honda Civic Si, almost all BMW's and a few other cars that escape my mind at this hour of the day. I think it's something of a safety thing
The Evo IX I believe is in it's second year right now.
I heard rumors of Direct Injection on the next model motor, which has helped the new Golf turbo have RIDICULOUS torque response (full torque at under 2k rpm)
Other than the interior, I welcome the new design
awdnot2
Jul 13 2006, 07:41 AM
The Audi/VW 2.0L was 1.8L turbo motors have always had full torque between 1750 and 1950 rpms over the years. The response is mostly the ridiculously small turbo.
Horsepower: 200 hp @ 5,100-6,000 rpm
Torque: 207 lb-ft @ 1800-5000 rpm
What is interesting is the flat torque curve and the horsepower peak. With the direct injection they get over 30mpg highway in the Audi A4's
0-60 mph in seconds: 7.1 (FrontTrak manual models), 7.3 (multitronic CVT with
FrontTrak and 6-speed manual with quattro), 7.5 (6-speed Tiptronic with quattro)
Top track speed: 130 mph*
EPA fuel economy estimates (city/highway)*:
multitronic: 24/32
manual, FrontTrak: 23/34
manual, quattro: 22/31
Tiptronic: 22/30
Kazz5
Jul 13 2006, 08:35 AM
I like the MIVEC and direct injection concepts, God knows. It's what they're building into the trans/diff parts that's scary. Sure,they can make anybody a good driver and cover up tons of mistakes. But they take away some of the finesse you can achieve with talent and practice. All the automatic recovery and prevention pieces are going to inhibit some fun driving and techniques that can be used effectively for better performance at times ... just thoughts ...
natedogg
Jul 13 2006, 09:13 AM
QUOTE (Kazz5 @ Jul 13 2006, 08:35 AM)
I like the MIVEC and direct injection concepts, God knows. It's what they're building into the trans/diff parts that's scary. Sure,they can make anybody a good driver and cover up tons of mistakes. But they take away some of the finesse you can achieve with talent and practice. All the automatic recovery and prevention pieces are going to inhibit some fun driving and techniques that can be used effectively for better performance at times ... just thoughts ...
Werd!
That's why the '03-'04 Evo VIII will always be my favorite. No Active Center Differential. Just pure unadulterated mechanical diffs.
Kazz5
Jul 13 2006, 10:55 AM
... especially after ya put an LSD up front ...
Zmann42087
Jul 13 2006, 08:41 PM
QUOTE (Kazz5 @ Jul 13 2006, 08:35 AM)
Sure,they can make anybody a good driver and cover up tons of mistakes. But they take away some of the finesse you can achieve with talent and practice.
my thoughts exactly.
bburden86
Jul 18 2006, 07:11 PM
i don't like how plain the inside looks. i don't know it just looks funny
natedogg
Jul 19 2006, 06:48 AM
Those pics are concept. I guarantee you the production interior will look much different.
akamiami
Jul 19 2006, 01:30 PM
from the pics of the EvoX on the new SCC mag it looks like the X will be based on the 7-9 platform as well. I'm relieved.
doayamaha
Jul 19 2006, 08:52 PM
love it sharp lines, new styling looks great. and from what i hear more power should be nice.
natedogg
Jul 20 2006, 07:22 AM
QUOTE (akamiami @ Jul 19 2006, 01:30 PM)
from the pics of the EvoX on the new SCC mag it looks like the X will be based on the 7-9 platform as well. I'm relieved.
I'm not so sure. After reading the article I took it that Evo VIII they were driving was just a test bed for the S-AWC system. The Evo IX was a J-spec version with the AYC. After seeing pics in Motor Trend of a taped up Evo X running on the Nuburgring, I don't think the exterior is going to look much like an VIII or IX.
akamiami
Jul 20 2006, 09:32 AM
damn, that's not making me happy.
Kazz5
Jul 24 2006, 06:07 PM
Read the SCC article's beginning closely. This is a test mule for the drivetrain, nothing more. That's been the buzz when this thing's been talked about is that it's posing in a IX dress.
What they actually release COULD be based on the IX but, apparently, may not be ...
There wasn't enough info in that article on the intelligent braking to suit me just yet. Gonna hafta stay tuned ...
JBone
Jul 24 2006, 07:50 PM
The platform could be based on the IX still, though. Look at the foxbody Stang. It went with roughly three different body styles, but it was still the same platform.
It's still possible.
Kazz5
Jul 29 2006, 01:24 PM
99Spyder
Apr 30 2007, 08:25 PM
Seen a couple of articles now saying that on the 26th Mitsu officially announced Protoype X as the Evolution X...
Official Evo XCar and Driver
turbohcar
Apr 30 2007, 08:31 PM
Yep, tis true. And not to mention that the fiscal 2006 year is the first in the last four years that they've actually turned a profit.
To be honest, I think it's going to kill EVO sales, even though they only account for a marginal portion of all Mitsubishi's revenue.
StreetSweeper
Apr 30 2007, 10:07 PM
PUKE!
SCCA Stang
May 1 2007, 12:03 AM
looks like to me that someone is still having fun in it
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.