Project Eclipse, Rebuild and Renew |
Project Eclipse, Rebuild and Renew |
Mar 2 2008, 04:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
DSMCentral Freak Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 6-May 04 From: Mahomet Illinois Member No.: 287 |
Hey all. After letting my car sit in my garage (waiting for funds to show up) i've got it back out on the road....almost. It's been having starting issues along with timing, electrical, cosmetic (interior and exterior), and overall tlc.
So here's the plan. I'm going to start stock piling parts and then me and my buddy are going to tear the whole engine and engine bay apart. Clean or replace everything in our way and revive a beastly engine to (hopefully) wake up the neighborhood once again. The initial list of needed parts (not including engine components) - Blow Through UICP (Replacing old UICP) - K & N Air Filter (Replacing severely damaged K & N Filter) - Fuel Rail (Need advice on quality brands) - 660 or greater injectors (Need advice on quality brands) - Intake Manifold (Need advice on whether to go with OEM or other brand) - Exhaust Manifold/Header for 14b/16g/20g turbo - Currently running 14b - looking to upgrade to 16g - New Vacuum lines - Possibly SAFC (unsure) - Possibly Electronic Boost Controller (currently using MBC underhood) - Downpipe Any advice on parts or procedures would be greatly appreciated. I'll update thread with engine components within the next few days (pistons, rods etc) -------------------- it's not a dsm unless it's leaking something
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 07:23 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 774 Joined: 28-October 02 From: Pekin Member No.: 32 |
Sounds like fun
Here is my .02 on your build, components, etc. Good 2.5" UICP is an easy build, 10 minutes with a welder and $20, and it will flow well. OEM fuel rail is fine, unless you're shooting for the stars. 660s? I loved my Denso's. OEM intake. Ported EVO3 exhaust manifold, EVO3 16g, EVO o2 housing. MAF-Translator will handle more power than the safc, but tune on a wideband. 3" Downpipe. Obviously, this is just my opinion, but this build will make good midrange power and be excellent for street use. I don't like high-strung motors -------------------- 2009 Scion Tc
1994 Del Sol Si 1991 Talon TSi AWD 1990 Mustang GT FOR SALE!!! |
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 08:25 AM
Post
#3
|
|
DSMCentral Freak Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 6-May 04 From: Mahomet Illinois Member No.: 287 |
I've got the MAF-Translator.
Stock Downpipe...but i'm looking at up grading the whole exhaust from 2.5" to 3" Where can i get a quality used Evo3 16g or better yet....the whole package?...i don't trust eBay for turbos...don't know why...just don't. With the blow-through UICP i was planning on running my filter right off the turbo...i've seen it done before....good/bad? The engine is already up to a 2.4L....is an OEM fuel rail going to be able to cut it? If i'm running the EVO3 16g, 255 Walbro Fuel Pump....are 660s going to cut it or should i go higher? -------------------- it's not a dsm unless it's leaking something
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 08:39 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 908 Joined: 7-October 03 From: Chillicothe, IL Member No.: 182 |
QUOTE I've got the MAF-Translator. Couldn't remember what exact setup you had to tune, but to get the most out of it I'd do a SAFC+MAFT at a minimum. If you've got the $$ then DSMLink is really the way to go. QUOTE Stock Downpipe...but i'm looking at up grading the whole exhaust from 2.5" to 3" This will make a huge difference. QUOTE The engine is already up to a 2.4L....is an OEM fuel rail going to be able to cut it? OEM is plenty. QUOTE If i'm running the EVO3 16g, 255 Walbro Fuel Pump....are 660s going to cut it or should i go higher? 660s are a good match for an evo3 16g and even have a little extra to give. You could talk to Dan to see if he still has my old Denso 720s laying around also. -------------------- GVR4 866/1000 = the perpetually broken car
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 04:31 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Zen Master DSM Group: Moderators Posts: 3,008 Joined: 10-January 01 From: in front of you Member No.: 5 |
I've got some 950's I'll sell you if you want lots of head room. If I'm reading you right, you have a 2.4. That will require more fuel than a 2.0 with a 16g
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 05:10 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 774 Joined: 28-October 02 From: Pekin Member No.: 32 |
2.4 will definitely need more fuel, and in all reality, that engine IMO will be wasted on a 16g. Cheap, streetable, but I'd go bigger... didn't realize the 2.4 part.
-------------------- 2009 Scion Tc
1994 Del Sol Si 1991 Talon TSi AWD 1990 Mustang GT FOR SALE!!! |
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 06:00 PM
Post
#7
|
|
DSMCentral Freak Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 6-May 04 From: Mahomet Illinois Member No.: 287 |
without needing a whole front mount kit and larger injectors (over 660)....i though that the EVO3 16g would be a decent setup
-------------------- it's not a dsm unless it's leaking something
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 07:28 PM
Post
#8
|
|
DSMCentral Godfather Group: Admin Posts: 3,823 Joined: 10-January 01 From: Washburn Member No.: 26 |
I persoanlly think the EVOIII 16g would make a great turbo on a 2.4 for Auto-x and street driving. It very well may run out of legs on the top of the RPM band. I bet it would be similar to the stock 2.0/14b characteristics except on steroids! The 2.4 and even a 2.0 can breath way out there on the RPM band with the bigger turbos. For the street an EVOIII will be hard to beat by anything but the real bad a$$ cars.
-------------------- In Loving memory of David T Crebo
Greatness comes from the most unexpected places! |
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 08:14 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 626 Joined: 25-September 02 From: Urbana, IL Member No.: 19 |
Once you're talking turbocharged cars, displacement has zero effect on the total fuel required. The compressor housing/wheel will choke out at exactly the same power level no matter if its a 1.5 or a 5.7. A 2.0 maxing out a 16g requires exactly the same amount of fuel as a 2.4 does.
On my heavily cammed 2.3, a single Evo III turbo would drop to about 16-17 psi by 8k rpm. It would probably hold 20psi with stock cams. 660's should be enough fuel, but they won't leave you with much breathing room. -------------------- Eric Wort
87 White Buick Turbo 'T' (11.71 @ 116.5, 1.61 60ft, slipping trans) 92 Teal Eagle Talon TSi AWD (burn victim) |
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 07:23 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 774 Joined: 28-October 02 From: Pekin Member No.: 32 |
QUOTE (wortdog @ Mar 3 2008, 08:14 PM) Once you're talking turbocharged cars, displacement has zero effect on the total fuel required. The compressor housing/wheel will choke out at exactly the same power level no matter if its a 1.5 or a 5.7. A 2.0 maxing out a 16g requires exactly the same amount of fuel as a 2.4 does. On my heavily cammed 2.3, a single Evo III turbo would drop to about 16-17 psi by 8k rpm. It would probably hold 20psi with stock cams. 660's should be enough fuel, but they won't leave you with much breathing room. Excellent call, and thanks for the correction... Been awhile since I've dealt with these cars I agree with Kicks, I think it would be a great street set-up, and spool would be great. I just always want more, and every time I've built a car, I've ended up wishing I had built in more headroom. It'd be tough to max out a 35, for example, but having the ability to go up in boost is nice. -------------------- 2009 Scion Tc
1994 Del Sol Si 1991 Talon TSi AWD 1990 Mustang GT FOR SALE!!! |
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 08:21 AM
Post
#11
|
|
DSMCentral Freak Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 6-May 04 From: Mahomet Illinois Member No.: 287 |
Right now, i'm running a 14b at close to 9psi.
the goal is to have a powerful street car....i don't need 450hp+ when i'm going 20mph through the 3 school zones between my house and where i work. i'll get the larger injectors but stick with the 16g question though, where can i pick up a reliable evo3 16g (new or used). i'm very skeptical about going through eBay. also, where would y'all suggest i find the manifold? -------------------- it's not a dsm unless it's leaking something
|
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 09:57 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Eats and sleeps DSM jargin. Group: Members Posts: 1,995 Joined: 27-November 04 From: Yates City IL Member No.: 389 |
Have you considered running the 14b to it's full potential? What's your final goal? Mid to low 12's are obtainable...
-------------------- 92 Eagle Talon TSI AWD "The Black Golfball" How fast can a 14B go???
91 Chevy C1500 "Problem Child" **SOLD** 01 Impala DD 07 Trailblazer Wife's new DD Cars run on blood, sweat, and horsepower... Without the first two, you can't get the last" SOB Racing "Sitting On Blocks" |
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 10:19 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 908 Joined: 7-October 03 From: Chillicothe, IL Member No.: 182 |
QUOTE Have you considered running the 14b to it's full potential? What's your final goal? Mid to low 12's are obtainable... Not with a FWD on street tires its not. Use your stock manifold. A 2g manifold is a great match for a 16g. As for where to get it, I'd check around at all of your normal DSM vendors. I think we've got a links section on here. You'll likely see full spool around 2500 with the torque falling off significantly after 5k. If you want more top end than that you'll need cams. -------------------- GVR4 866/1000 = the perpetually broken car
|
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 05:42 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Eats and sleeps DSM jargin. Group: Members Posts: 1,995 Joined: 27-November 04 From: Yates City IL Member No.: 389 |
Ok...I missed the FWD part. Still, he's only running the 14b at 9 psi....that's not even close to using it to it's capabilty. Run that 14b to 18-20 psi and it should still run decent numbers. A 16g will definitely make up on the top end for the traction limited FWD launch. But again it's all what you want to get out of the car TotalEclipse97.
-------------------- 92 Eagle Talon TSI AWD "The Black Golfball" How fast can a 14B go???
91 Chevy C1500 "Problem Child" **SOLD** 01 Impala DD 07 Trailblazer Wife's new DD Cars run on blood, sweat, and horsepower... Without the first two, you can't get the last" SOB Racing "Sitting On Blocks" |
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 07:42 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Zen Master DSM Group: Moderators Posts: 3,008 Joined: 10-January 01 From: in front of you Member No.: 5 |
QUOTE (wortdog @ Mar 3 2008, 08:14 PM) Once you're talking turbocharged cars, displacement has zero effect on the total fuel required. The compressor housing/wheel will choke out at exactly the same power level no matter if its a 1.5 or a 5.7. A 2.0 maxing out a 16g requires exactly the same amount of fuel as a 2.4 does. On my heavily cammed 2.3, a single Evo III turbo would drop to about 16-17 psi by 8k rpm. It would probably hold 20psi with stock cams. 660's should be enough fuel, but they won't leave you with much breathing room. Hmm...Interesting. I had to up my injectors when I went stroker. I was running the same turbo as I was on the 2.0 for a while anyway. Only thing I really changed was to a stroker engine. Boost was pretty much the same too. Not saying you're wrong, because it makes sense since the turbo is pretty much what determines your airflow, but for some reason or another, I needed bigger injectors when I stroked. <-- Yes Jbone...I know. |
|
|
Mar 4 2008, 09:01 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 626 Joined: 25-September 02 From: Urbana, IL Member No.: 19 |
Since you kept the boost the same, you made more power with the stroker, and needed more fuel. You didn't have enough injector to max out the 2.0 either
-------------------- Eric Wort
87 White Buick Turbo 'T' (11.71 @ 116.5, 1.61 60ft, slipping trans) 92 Teal Eagle Talon TSi AWD (burn victim) |
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 08:21 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Zen Master DSM Group: Moderators Posts: 3,008 Joined: 10-January 01 From: in front of you Member No.: 5 |
Ahh but the low-end torque is wonderful!
|
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 09:09 AM
Post
#18
|
|
DSMCentral Freak Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 6-May 04 From: Mahomet Illinois Member No.: 287 |
a 12sec car would be awesome....i can shoot for something close to that.
i'm looking for a reliable setup for this engine w/ either a maxed out 14b or a 16g that can give me more room to breathe if i end up wanting to keep going on mods later on. -------------------- it's not a dsm unless it's leaking something
|
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 09:45 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Post Master Group: Members Posts: 780 Joined: 14-July 04 Member No.: 338 |
IMO, the E316g will be as much fun as you can imagine for a VERY long time. You can take that turbo all the way through a total FMIC upgrade and many other higher-end mods without exceeding it's capacity. I absolutely loved mine, and I regret the situation that led to my getting rid of it.
I ran 660's on it without any problems, but that was at about 22psi on a stock intercooler, so I don't know what one would do on the rocket with it's ginormous front mount. Of course, I have plenty of time to find out now that I get to keep it. -------------------- QUOTE (gsxracer80 @ Oct 31 2006, 12:41 AM)
thanks hcar.... I am still massaging that area trying to get it ready... |
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 10:28 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Eats and sleeps DSM jargin. Group: Members Posts: 1,995 Joined: 27-November 04 From: Yates City IL Member No.: 389 |
The 14b will be maxed out...that's for sure. But it is fun running 12's on the "little" turbo. You could still run the bigger injectors and everything else and upgrade the turbo later.
If you have the money for the 16g I would go for it. If I had the extra money, I'd be running one. By my blown motor last year killed that plan, for now. Goat, your keeping the Rocket?? We going to race this year? -------------------- 92 Eagle Talon TSI AWD "The Black Golfball" How fast can a 14B go???
91 Chevy C1500 "Problem Child" **SOLD** 01 Impala DD 07 Trailblazer Wife's new DD Cars run on blood, sweat, and horsepower... Without the first two, you can't get the last" SOB Racing "Sitting On Blocks" |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 03:49 AM |